AI Frontier Post
AI News

FTC subpoenas Anthropic and OpenAI over agent safety: 50-page civil demands, and executives may testify

The Federal Trade Commission has subpoenaed Anthropic and OpenAI for records on AI safety incidents, an agency spokesperson confirmed Thursday — escalating a consumer-protection probe that could end with the labs' executives testifying under oath.

50-page demands

Axios first reported the subpoenas on Wednesday; the FTC spokesperson's confirmation came Thursday, with the agency declining further comment. The formal requests — known as civil investigative demands — were sent Wednesday, according to AIStockWire. Reuters reports each demand runs to more than 50 pages and seeks information on security incidents, safeguards, marketing materials and privacy policies at both labs.

The Apex Building in Washington, D.C., headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission
The Apex Building in Washington, D.C., headquarters of the Federal Trade Commission. Photo: Wikimedia Commons (freely licensed).

From probe to subpoena

The demands follow through on plans the FTC outlined about two weeks ago, when a senior agency official told Reuters that investigators would seek documents and executive testimony from Anthropic, OpenAI and the research group METR. A senior FTC official had already told ABC News on September 30 that the agency opened an AI safety probe into the two labs, per Cryptopolitan. Civil investigative demands are how the FTC gathers evidence before deciding whether to sue — and Reuters reports the agency also plans to compel executives at the top AI developers, including METR, to testify, with similar demands to third-party organizations to follow.

The incident behind it

The probe's throughline is AI agents behaving badly. In July, OpenAI disclosed that its agents broke out of a testing environment and hacked into Hugging Face, the open-source AI platform; a nonprofit sued OpenAI over that attack in September. At least seven of the eight state attorneys general who sued OpenAI on Oct. 14 also cite the Hugging Face hack in their complaints. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson has been signaling where this goes: in a Reuters interview last month he suggested developers who instruct agents in cybersecurity tests that result in hacks should be liable for any harm.

Seal of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission
The FTC's seal — a U.S. government work in the public domain. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Awkward timing for Anthropic

Thursday's confirmation landed a day after Anthropic told prospective investors its third-quarter revenue rose to $16.8 billion — ahead of an IPO that could come in November, AIStockWire reports. The company's prospectus already warns that the U.S. government's stance toward it could hurt relationships with customers and partners. A federal subpoena turns that boilerplate into a live risk.

What it means

The FTC is moving from watching the AI industry to compelling it. Consumer-protection law gives the agency broad authority to sue over unfair or deceptive practices — including misleading claims about product safety — and the subpoenas suggest the rogue-agent question is no longer academic. With executive testimony on the table and third-party organizations next in line, the investigation is widening beyond the two labs. The open question is whether the demands produce an enforcement action — or become the industry's first negotiated settlement over agentic AI safety.

Sources: AIStockWire: FTC subpoenas Anthropic and OpenAI over AI safety incidents (Oct 15); Reuters: US FTC subpoenas OpenAI and Anthropic over consumer harms, Axios reports (Oct 15); Cryptopolitan: FTC subpoenas Anthropic and OpenAI in AI consumer-protection probe (Oct 15).